Research of hypothetical base of strategy of technological modernization and increase of innovative potential in the fast-growing economies

Abstract

The article deals with a comparative analysis of the experience of macro-planning of innovative strategies and technological modernization of economies in the countries of the so-called emerging economies group. In this study, the author develops a theoretical framework and a general hypothesis about the characteristics of technological modernization processes. This study is an attempt to develop and apply a new conceptual framework for assessing the sustainability of innovative growth in emerging economies.

References

  1. Солоу Р.М. Техническое развитие и агрегированная производственная функция // The Rev. Econ. Stat. 1957. 39 (№ 3). С. 312–320.
  2. Матризаев Б.Д. Макростратегии инновационного развития и глобальный экономический рост: Макроэкономический анализ, тренды, прогнозы. М., 2018.
  3. Матризаев Б.Д. Глобальное инновационное лидерство: макроконтуры и моделирование его концептуальной основы // Муниципальная академия. 2018. № 1. С. 85–91.
  4. Aghion P., Howitt P. A model of growth through creative destruction // Econometrica. 1992. 60 (№ 2). P. 323–351.
  5. Akamatsu K. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries // Dev. Econ. 1962. 1 (№ 1). P. 3–25.
  6. Bell M., Pavitt K. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries // Archibugi D., Michie J. (Eds.), Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance. Cambridge, 1997. P. 25–45.
  7. Bell M. Innovation Capabilities and Directions of Development // STEPS Working Paper (Brighton: STEPS Centre). 2009. № 33. P. 18–25.
  8. Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation // Adm. Sci. Q. 1990. 35 (№ 1). P. 128–152.
  9. Ernst D. Industrial Upgrading Through Low-Cost and Fast Innovation—Taiwan’s Experience. East-West Center Working Paper. Honolulu, 2013.
  10. Ernst D. Industrial Upgrading Through Low-Cost and Fast Innovation—Taiwan’s Experience. East-West Center Working Paper. Honolulu, 2013. P. 133.
  11. Dutrenit G. Learning and Knowledge Management in the Firm: From Knowledge Accumulation to Strategic Capabilities. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, 2000. P. 57–78.
  12. Fagerberg J., Godinho M. Innovation and catching-up // Mowery D.C., Fagerberg J., Nelson R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York, 2005.
  13. Findlay R. Relative backwardness, direct foreign investment, and the transfer of technology: a simple dynamic model // Q. J. Econ. 1978. 92 (№ 1). P. 1–16.
  14. Grossman G., Helpman E. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Massachusetts, 1991. P. 70–74.
  15. Hobday M. East Asian latecomer firms: learning the technology of electronics // World Dev. 1995. 23 (№ 7). P. 1171–1193.
  16. Imbs J., Wacziarg R. Stages of diversification // Am. Econ. Rev. 2003. 93 (№ 1). P. 63–86.
  17. Koopmans T.C. Measurement without theory // Rev. Econ. Stat. 1947. 29 (№ 3). P. 161–172.
  18. Krüger J.J. Productivity and structural change: a review of the literature // J. Econ. Surv. 2008. 22 (№ 2). P. 330–363.
  19. Lall S. Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. 1992. P. 34–42.
  20. Lee K. Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-Up: Knowledge, Path-Creation, and the Middle-Income Trap. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. P. 35–49.
  21. Lee K., Kim B. Both institutions and policies matter but differently for different income groups of countries: determinants of long-run economic growth revisited // World Dev. 2009. 37 (№ 3). P. 533–549.
  22. Lin J.Y., Rosenblatt D. Shifting patterns of economic growth and rethinking development // J. Econ. Policy Reform. 2012. 15 (№ 3). P. 171–194.
  23. Makino S., Lau C., Yeh R. Asset-exploitation versus asset-seeking: implications for location choice of foreign direct investment from newly industrialized economies // J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2002. 33 (№ 3). P. 403–421.
  24. Radosevic S., Yoruk E. Why do we need a theory and metrics of technology upgrading? // Asian J. Technol. Innovation. 2016. № 24. P. 8–32.
  25. Romer P.M. Endogenous technological change // J. Polit. Econ. 1990. 98 (№ 5). P. S71–S102.
  26. Radosevic S., Yoruk E. Why do we need a theory and metrics of technology upgrading? // Asian J. Technol. Innovation. 2016. № 24. P. 8–32.
  27. Radosevic S., Yoruk E. Technology upgrading of middle-income economies: a new approach and results // Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2018. № 129. P. 56–75.
  28. Rostow W.W. The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifest. Second Enlarged Edition. Cambridge, 1960. P. 35–42.
  29. Sandven T., Smith K., Kaloudis A. Structural change, growth and innovation: the roles of medium and low tech industries, 1980–2000 // Hirsch-Kreinsen H., Jacobson D., Laestadius S., Smith K., Lang P. (Eds.), Low-Tech Innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Frankfurt, 2005. P. 31–63.
  30. Sturgeon T.J., Gereffi G. Measuring success in the global economy: International trade, industrial upgrading, and business function outsourcing in global value chains // Transnatl. Corporations. 2009. 18 (№ 2). P. 1–35.
  31. Verspagen B. A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind // Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 1995. 2 (№ 2). P. 359–380.
  32. Nelson R.R. Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change // J. Econ. Lit. 33 (№ 1). P. 48–90.
  33. Von Tunzelmann G.N. Technology and Industrial Progress: The Foundations of Economic Growth. Aldershot, 1995. P. 10–15.
  34. Von Tunzelmann N., Acha V. Innovation in ‘low-tech’ industries // Fagerberg J., Mowery D., Nelson R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford, 2005.
  35. Wang J., Blomström M. Foreign investment and technology transfer // Eur. Econ. Rev. 1992. 36 (№ 1). P. 137–155.

Statistics

Download data is not yet available.