Mixed innovation policy: managing challenges in a new strategic axis

Authors

B. D. Matrizaev
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Russian Federation

Abstract

This research aims to intensify the understanding of the interaction between governance processes and the assessment of mixed policies in the specific context of smart specialisation strategies. These new regional innovation strategies are the ideal laboratories for the analysis of the hybrid policy due to their geographically-oriented and experimental nature, focus and potential orientation to major social problems, as well as due to the complex governance context.

Keywords

innovation policy, mixed policy, actors, strategy, smart specialization

Author Info

B. D. Matrizaev

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Theory at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

Email: matrizaev@mail.ru

References

  1. Зотов В.Б. О реализации инновационного потенциала города Москвы на территории Юго-Восточного административного округа города Москвы: сборник материалов межрегиональной науч.-практ. конф. / под ред. В.Б. Зотова. М: Издательство Юго-Восток-Сервис, 2009. С.18–28.
  2. Кейнс Дж.М. Метод профессора Тинбергена // Вопросы экономики. 2007. №4. с. 4–27.
  3. Матризаев Б.Д. Макростратегии инновационного развития и глобальный экономический рост: Макроэкономический анализ, тренды, прогнозы. М., 2018.
  4. Матризаев Б.Д. Глобальное инновационное лидерство: макроконтуры и моделирование его концептуальной основы // Муниципальная академия, 2018. № 1. С. 85–91
  5. Aranguren M.-J., Magro E., Wilson J.R., 2017b. Regional competitiveness policy evaluation as a transformative process: from theory to practice. Environ. Plan. C: Polit. Space.
  6. Bennett C.J., Howlett M. The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sci. 1992. 25, 275–294.
  7. Bevir M. Governance: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  8. Borrás S., Edquist C. The choice of innovation policy instruments // Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2013. 80 (8), 1513–1522.
  9. Coenen L., Truffer B. Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field // Eur. Plan. Stud. 2012. 20 (3), 367–374.
  10. Del Río P. On evaluating success in complex policy mixes: the case of renewable energy support schemes // Policy Sci. 2014. 47 (3), 267.
  11. Flanagan K., Uyarra E., Laranja M. Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation // Res. Policy. 2011. 40, 702–713.
  12. Foray D. Should we let the genie out of the bottle? On the new industrial policy agenda and the example of smart specialization // Antonietti R., Coró G., Gambarotto F. (Eds.), Uscire dalla crisi: Cittá, comunitá, specializzazioni intelligenti. FrancoAngeli, Milan, 2015.
  13. Hodson M., Marvin S. Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? // Res. Policy. 2010. 39 (4), 477–485.
  14. Lynn L.E. The many faces of governance: adaptation? Transformation? Both? Neither? // Levi-Faur D. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.
  15. Magro E., Wilson J.R. Evaluating territorial strategies. In: Valdaliso J.M., Wilson J.R. (Eds.), Strategies for Shaping Territorial Competitiveness. Routledge, Abingdon, UK and New York, USA, 2015.
  16. Marinelli E., Perianez Forte I. ‘Smart Specialisation at Work: The Entrepreneurial Discovery as a Continuous Process’, S3 Working Paper Series NO. 12/2017. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Seville. 2017.
  17. Radosevic S. Assessing EU smart specialization policy in a comparative perspective. In: Radosevic S., Curaj A., Gheorghiu R., Andreescu L., Wade I. (Eds.), Advances in the Theory and Practice of Smart Specialization. Academic Press, London, 2017.
  18. Rodríguez-Pose A., Wilkie C. Institutions and the entrepreneurial discovery process for smart specialization // Kyriakou D., Palazuelos Martínez M., Periáñez-Forte I., Rainoldi A. (Eds.), Governing Smart Specialisation. Routledge, Abingdon, UK and New York, USA, 2017
  19. Rodrik D. Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. Kennedy School of Government Working Paper RWP04–047. Boston, 2004.
  20. Rogge K.S., Reichardt K. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis // Res. Policy. 2016. 45 (8), 1620–1635.
  21. Shove E., Walker G. Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life // Res. Policy. 2010. 39 (4), 471–476.
  22. Tödtling F., Trippl M. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach // Res. Policy. 2005. № 34 (8), 1203–1219.
  23. Truffer B. The Geography of Sustainability Transitions: Think/act, globally/locally. Inaugural Lecture. Utrecht University. 2016.
  24. Veugelers R. Too Much of Not Enough Heterogeneity in Innovation Policies Among EU Member States // European Policy Brief. 2015. № 8.

Statistics

Download data is not yet available.

Article Sidebar

PDF (Russian) JATS XML

Article Details

Issue

2019 · No. 2 (54)

Section

Innovative Economy

Publication History

Published 2019-06-17

How to Cite

[1]
Matrizaev B.D. Mixed innovation policy: managing challenges in a new strategic axis // Economics: Theory and Practice. 2019. No 2 (54). С. 20–27. URL: https://etip.kubsu.ru/article/view/477

License

Copyright (c) 2019 B. D. Matrizaev

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.